Craig whytes fenian army
Jackson has never hidden his love for all things Liverpool, today he shared this gem with his readers :. But Steven Gerrard appears to have gone one step further with this Rangers side by styling it upon his own hair. Immaculately prepared with remarkably consistent results and, yes, more often than not, head and shoulders above the opposition.
They were ruffled for a while yesterday by a stubborn Dundee United and the tactically impressive Micky Mellon whose rope-a-dope strategy very nearly stopped the runaway league leaders in their tracks yesterday. Am playing avoidance just now, gettin some grub together.. Bed is short term tactical objective. Prove you can stand on your own two feet for once! Folks,our club Derry no1,took 25 children from the Brandywell area of the city to paradise today..
My brother is leading the group,and by his reports they have had the best day off their lives…. Celtic Quick News on News Now.
Previous Article Celtic Hearts. Paul67 Website. Stringer Bell on 13th May pm. Craig whites Fenian army. Top ten ktf. Bloke is Neil Lennon on 13th May pm. Blimey, Real Madrid know how to organise a title celebration. Gene's a Bhoys name on 13th May pm. We make plans and adapt them to suit, depending on what transpires. He seems to regret not doing so earlier, if anything. After admin he must have planned to make sure he kept control of the assets.
His security on the assets is the best evidence you will get of that bu there is other evidence. Certainly he would be insane to buy Ibrox, shoulder an 18 million pound debt and walk away once he achieved getting the company into administration — that would be insane.
So, we can assume that administration was the plan and he planned to come though it one way or another with the assets. He had a security that guaranteed he could not lose. The plan got tricky when rangers fans got wise to it, and John Brown played a part there whatever they say about him now. I guess this is where people like Jack Irvine play their parts in keeping the unclean masses out of the way.
They did know, and they still do, I would guess. Just how long Green was already party to the shenanigans is less relevant, he was necessary to take the game forward. I have no doubt that a sale and leaseback of the assets will take place in order to free up yet more funds, although, I do believe that the running of a football club is now incidental to the overall game plan.
The grip on the assets will not be yielded by any amount of leaflets passed out at Ibrox today; the sale and leaseback deal is the iceberg on the horizon for the Govan crew.
The assets are the major prize, yet I cannot see their real value being met in relation to any future buy out of a football club. Once the sanctions are coerced from the SFA against the club; the big money can be made from prime real estate.
Opportunism appears to be the major factor at play, where turn of events may not have been anticipated. The supposed conflict between Green and Whyte presents a major opportunity to cause a fissure so great that it could force the SFA to respond to their own criticism of CW as penned in their 5 way agreement.
Orchestration is at play, Charlotte Fakeovers is proof of that; and with any orchestration; timing of delivery is all important. The SFA is being played like a fiddle. Charles Green is by his own admission a very devious man; his Rangersitis is easily cured by healthy injection of cash.
I think your on the money there and this fans revolt plays into the spivs hands to cash in on the real estate. A bit speculative Raymond. As of yet, unlike Celtic, there are no debts issued against them.
Rangers have no debt. Like numerous people have stated, we are only guessing, until either the AGM, or the audited accounts, fail to materialise. As a Rangers fan, i prefer to wait. As an aside, why are CFC supporters interested and becoming increasingly impatient over the accounts of a club they refuse to accept exists. Bizarre or what? There is no doubt that funds are running out. When the geezers in charge opt for a sale and leaseback to release more funds; the entire landscape shall be altered, the assets will then be vulnerable.
By the actions of Charles Green, he has left the club at its most vulnerable; his relationship with Craig Whyte has the potential to destroy the club. There would obviously be a price to pay by way of sanction from the SFA if it is proved of any complicity by Green and Whyte.
At this stage, those sanctions may be preferable than to lose Ibrox to an orchestrated manoeuvre; of which the end game would reveal of the above duplicity in any event. The revelation of a sale and leaseback deal will signal the end for the club.
Once again when are funds are leached; the SFA shall suddenly be furnished with indisputable evidence of the dynamic duo being in cahoots. The course of events within this football season shall soon determine whether any football at Ibrox is to continue in future seasons. Your whole theory is based on one premise, the assets have a greater value outside of football than in it, and yet you have not one iota of logic or evidence to support your premise.
If Rangers are not a viable business then the assets are worth little, and yet these assets are seemingly going to be sold BECAUSE Rangers is not a viable business, this is a paradox no Celtic fan can escape from. I do not believe it is wise to build an entire theory around a false premise,you do not know if funds are running out. So your evidence is an old regeneration project that has been mothballed for years, hardly an advert for booming real estate values.
You have already argued the case of how difficult it is for each Glasgow club to break even, never mind make a profit. Your own argument provides evidence that alternative use of the sites could provide better investment. Both sites, Murray Park and Ibrox have great potential as money spinning development projects, the biggest obstacle is a pesky football club.
Looking purely from a business objective; each site of RIFC assets have the potential to create massive profits from development of the land for alternative purpose, all without the hassle connected to running a football club. The fact Sottish football is a marginal business is not evidence the land has more value elsewhere, you are drawing a false conclusion, one that contradicts the evidence.
The bids for the assets proved the assets were worth more to the footballing fraternity than real estate, and nothing since has persuaded me otherwise. I think you should take something obvious into account, not all sites have the same value and more importantly, any asset bidder is going to get a breakdown value of the assets, this would involve a real estate evaluation, it would be essential for the investors.
He would know what figure he would have to beat as a bare minimum, and the measly figure of 1. My earlier post pointed to the danger of Green and Whyte exploiting the terms of the 5 way agreement to meet their ends, which could lead to TRFC facing expulsion from the game even a suspension period or any demotion would finish them off.
With no football business to contest, the planners would be inundated with proposals to exploit the undoubted potential of the famous landmark. The Milngavie site has already potential to be a housing development. This is for you bozo. Monti… Do your Celtic thing…you need to clatter or make a phone call. Try the SFA. I have got to go down there and sit in the dark until I stop laughing at R anger S.
What a day to come back out celtic humped ayrshire rangers. And this blog has exploded the last couple of days. Off the ball was great today as always. Old football groups the Govan loving Spoonful. Just a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down update Just a spoonful of bile helps the truth go down.
You see obsession is a funny thing. It is borne out of either love or hate. Bizarre that innit? So you either love or hate something to obsess over it.
What a strange chap! One of your cronies said this was a celtic site. That does not stop all the sevconians coming on incessantly. A strange chap well takes one to know one as some people say. Good evening O. I was worried about you dear. I thought you may have been spotted on that traffic island with your green jumper on.
Rangers were at home today. Ask the SFA. What is also strange is that you obsess over something that you believe exists yet the poster is as you claim obsessive in his views that it does not. Must be an obsession. Howdy Davy, I remember seeing Davy Cooper a few weeks before he died. He had stopped at a cash machine on the one way system in Hamilton town centre, just after me. He looked every inch the successful athlete — very fit and tanned, well dressed and a nice plush car.
His death was an absolute shock and very sad. But Rangers were liquidated on 31st October They left huge debts behind and natural justice and company law demands the most severe sanction of termination. There is no creation of man that is immortal — not even Rangers Football Club.
Hi Ed. The only thing he did to excess, was play football and worship his family. He was a sad loss, at such a young age, and IMO would have made a tremendous coach to the youngsters coming through. I met him in Sion, Switzerland, I think it was around He and Davie McPherson the white Pele lol, spent around half an hour with us at a cafe.
Treasured memories indeed. Davie Cooper was sheer quality! A massive lost to Scottish football, would have been a great coach! Sad loss,very much so! Nope, not for me! The bbc documentary revealed his traits; buy failing companies, strip the assets, make money, move on.
No single individual could have access to all that material. Remember that these money-grubbing tricksters and sociopaths are convinced that they are far smarter than everyone else. At Goldman Sachs it was common to refer to clients as muppets.
Excellent and clear post with clarity on the base issue identified by many posters on here over the last 2 years, one point missed though IMO is that Craig White is the puppet of the main man and he remains at arms length and immune to all the ongoings and that is DM, IMHO.
When you factor in this last piece then you have the whole plan that was formulated with the banks and footballing officials all involved from a very early stage.
The more I think about the Charlotte fakes stuff, the more I think it just looks like it was intended to distract us all from the main event. I remember when Charlotte appeared and it annoyed me for that reason. If the rangers fans knew Whyte was behind Green hiding, I doubt if they would have bought season tickets last year. Speculation must be based on something, whether it be logic or evidence or both, most of the speculation on here is based on what is unknown and contradicts what is known.
I am really not sure this kind of speculation threatens the integrity of the media, SFA or Rangers. Maybe internet bampots is a bit condescending and harsh, but in my opinion there is a distinct lack of reasoning and critical thinking, and lots of dot joining without any known dots. It does remind me how our minds are extremely susceptible to illusion, delusion, hallucination and cognitive bias.
Do you really think Whyte intended to take over rangers and keep them afloat or do you think he intended to go into administration at some point? Evidence suggests the latter. In view of that, do you think he intended to come through administration in control of the assets or watch a stranger run off with them? Do you think his response to being demonised in the press and the potential problems of his ownership would have led him to withdraw from the whole scene or do you think he would have engineered a simple and obvious way to get around difficulties associated with his continuing involvement?
Looking forward rather than back, what happens with the Sevco claim will be interesting. Goldstein suggests it is part of the smoke and mirrors and that the case will come to nothing.
Indeed, logically, if Whyte pursued the case he would be taking his own company to court in effect since he is the grand architect and a major share holder in RIFC. Now with Charlotte; no criminal charges have been made, no great big denials and only in recent times have documents been removed by either a complainant or through use of a legal means.
I said he would have various plans to deal with various events, his overall plan involved him not putting in any of his own money until the BTC was resolved. You look back with the benefit of hindsight and conclude an orchestrated liquidation regardless of events, and I disagree.
Of course he hoped to salvage the assets from any worst case scenario, this does not suggest he planned the worst case scenario, and his hopes were dashed when his floating charge was dismissed.
CW saw an opportunity to save face and make a few million, and CG deprived him of this opportunity. You have no evidence CW intended to liquidate regardless of events, and none of his subsequent actions support this claim, his theory and your support lack evidence and logic.
Craig Whyte, however, absolutely was an expert and it would have been remiss in the extreme for him not to have a contingency that covered liquidation. At a recent training course about work practices,safety,and how management and workers see things from different perspectives. Bins blocking a fire escape no problem as they have always been there and nothing has happened,so it is OK. It is OK until the shit hits the fan and people are trapped in a building because the fire escapes are blocked.
Remember when we heard, rangers are too Big to Fail? Remember WATP all is well? Remember that Fenian blogger is a Liar? Remember all the anti-rangers Bias? Remember when everyone were liars? Remember all the world is against us and got it in for us? Mainstream media reported on the financial state of MIH and Rangers from the crash in onwards, it was hardly a state secret, from this point onward Rangers were never considered too big to fail. The board were very transparent with their fans, Rangers had to clear off their overdraft at 1 million per year, and no further leverage would be given.
Phil predicted the BTC would bankrupt Rangers, he was wrong, the contingent liability made it difficult to attract investment or leverage, end of story. B — A consensus existed that under no circumstances should the horses be frightened with the reality of the situation.
Had the BTC case went against Rangers there would have been no possibility of any kind of revival or a reform of the dead club. You are aware of this Niall, but of course are rewarded for your mission of spreading misinformation.. Phil never predicted that. What he did say in his book downfall and elsewhere, which I can happily quote directly for you, is that if they lose they are going to have huge liabilities hanging over them.
Quite right too. Interesting slant you put on this though. Totally warped, actually. The bottom line is that the BTC was an absolutely huge determining factor in the eventual administration and demise of RFC. Th small tax case was a manageable amount and clearly would probably have been avoided altogether had not the sense of impending doom existed as a consequence looming BTC. I assume you are geared towards slating Phil rather than throwing light or expanding four understanding of the subject.
I was told by many rangers supporters just before Duff and Duffer came in that rangers were too big to fail. The internet was full of bampots and liars. Rangers were such an institution that the government would step in. They would never go down to the lower leagues as the SPL and all of Scottish footballl would be cream crackered without them even though they talked for ages about going to England.
I like the phrase though Normalized Deviance. A Knighthood for Craig Whyte! Rangers boss Ally McCoist and coaching team take wage cut to help club rebuild finances 28 Sep Ally may be a poor football manager but he is a shrewd politician, a management pay cut is hardly going to transform Rangers into profitability, but if the accounts reveal a marginal business with excessive management costs then his loyalties could be questioned.
I would say this was more of a token gesture for political gain rather than evidence of Rangers going bust at Christmas. I still go for either break even in or a few million loss at worst, if it was the latter then these pay cuts become meaningful. Sounds more like a spiv than a shrewd politician. Very undignified. Defend you are such a w………is this the new modern team, the tribute act you spoke about to me away to your bed, we own you now..
That suggests that this is a NEW worry. Could this possibly be what has happened with the IPO money? Let us try and put things into context first, the general running costs at Celtic are over 60 million, that is 5 million per month.
Rangers had 20 million on Dec 31st and 5 months later they have 10 million, so they spent 10 million more than they received, 5 million of which was on assets and improvements to the stadium. Rangers frittered away 5 million in 5 months, a million per month.
Wiki Nial You are a proven liar and a troll deflect away your team is deid hahahahahahahahaha Woof woof. Tits up by Christmas? Charlotte is Pre whyte.. If you are reliably informed then you are unique, everyone else is guessing, as for the old asset conspiracy, God knows why you still cling onto it.
Surely there will be a right back in this week, if not I will make a comeback. Oooh Griff took it literally. I cannae get the game; local pubs have sky and bt but NOT fn Premier sport. Spoke to my brother just as Mikey scored a belter. Bombs, bullets and secret escapes, in the daily life of the Celtic manager, if your name happens to be, Neil Francis Lennon.
Silent house moves to protect his family, the poison that, that wee man has to endure. But haud oan, even some with degrees are up for a bit of bully. When the so called educated join in the fray, you know that the games a bogey. Sectarianism is racism with a different name that wears the same identity. Afternoon Mikey, good to be back on here again my friend. How do you reckon things could turn out in Bosnia this evening? Guten Tag, mein freund, wir sind alle gut.
I think that it might be a tough one tonight Yoker, however I have confidence in Lenny, his stats are as good as they come in the C. At the moment I would settle for a John McGinn win of any description.
Like your team, but would luv to see Good Golly Mr. Das is zer gut. This is gonny be some summer for signings, maybe an even more adventurous window than the one we had 9 years ago when Lenny himself brought in Izzy, Kayal, Juarez, Hooper and others to freshen up the team. Juarez was the only one not to make any impact.
Enjoy the game Mikey, hope we can come away with a result. Ja Ja dreimal Ja. Mikey likey cockles and mussels, in the leggy-kins. Ya beauty, the serious shit kicks off once again. He could well make the bench though. Your collective 2-way craic verges on nauseating. Thank you. None of you may take a crap for 48 hours. Much better to come and a right back is a must. Great to see Sincy score. Well done the bhoys. Great result which should help see us safely through.
Solid, controlled performance for most of the second half with some very decent individual displays and three fine goals, particularly the first one. Some nice touches and good movement from both Morgan and Sinclair when they came on. I know we had a makeshift defence tonight but this is an area that badly needs sorted.
Hopefully this will start to gel once the new signings get bedded in. Anxiously awaiting news on Mikey and Goli. Our friendly against Rennes a very good team on Saturday should help us further with our pre-season build-up.
0コメント